05
03
The special margin fan clutch Analysis drinking and remote control car can be considered drunk drivi
Time:2013.05.03 Come:Yuhuan, teyu machinery Co., LTD fan clutch View:
Recently, a section called "the woman drunken remote driving a car liberties with the traffic police" video on the Internet widespread. Video, a pair of drunken young men and women in high-risk car was stopped by traffic police, the woman climbed on the hood of a car, start the car with a remote control device and remote vehicle driving slowly. Woman traffic police, said: "drunk driving in the car is out of the car, is drunk driving?"
      
According to the special Yu Fan Clutch understand, this woman drunken remote molesting traffic police for driving a car video trigger hot friends mainly due to: the remote driving a car is a drunk driving after drinking? According to public information, remotely piloted vehicle technology is not fantasy, a brand cars on display at the Beijing Auto Show this year, there are models already configured this technology. According to car manufacturers claim that this technology is for the convenience of parking, avoid scratching. However, with respect to the advancement of technology, legal aspects remained blank. At present, there are no remote control for drink driving expressly provided.

     
Most traffic police said that the law enforcement for many years, had never encountered such a situation, there really is no traffic management regulations can be based. But they generally agreed that, in the actual enforcement process, as long as the vehicle is in the parties' actual manipulation "under" does not necessarily have both hands on the steering wheel, can still be regarded as drunk driving, and should carry out some punishment.

     
Definition of driving it with manipulate cars, boats and other means of delivery. Manipulate the car, do not have to touch the steering wheel, the car is launched by the woman in this video, but also in her under the control of walking, which belongs to drunk driving. "Xiamen Municipal Public Security Bureau who has 18 years of law enforcement experience old traffic police officer Chen also believes that, in the future this" remote control car "may more and more, the law does not expressly provide really easy to be abused and lead. But strictly speaking, the manipulation of the car is a kind of driving behavior, the same can not violate the laws and regulations of the Road Traffic Safety Law ".

     
We often say that driving is the driver sitting in the car according to their own will under the control of the vehicles. If the driver is not in the car does not belong to driving. As the driver trolleys, can not be considered driving. In addition, the Traffic Safety Law "drunk driving is identified, must be the subject of crime, can not find the main punished can not be convicted. The driver is not the car, control of the vehicle by remote control or by other means, does not belong to the driver in the strict sense, of course, should not be considered as drunk driving. With Bruckhaus Deringer the Chen Fuwen lawyer also think that the domestic traffic law since there is no detailed provisions should not be counted as "drunk driving". This point of view can be seen as the "high-tech to avoid legal penalties.

To avoid the debate on whether they are "drunk driving", put us down for the event two drunken hero hostility, should sensibly In fact, the two parties did not personally driving drunk, but chose a more cautious "remotely piloted" they still wary of the law, there is no rush to touch the red line of "drunk driving", they are emboldened and traffic police argue; "I am in the car, did not touch the steering wheel, how can you count drunk driving?"

According to special margin Fan Clutch noted, it is apparent, after drinking "remotely piloted" the intention is a more secure way for the driver to shift his vehicle, although it seems that some "unreasonable" because there is no such precedent. Designed for this technology, the behavior is absolutely safe and controlled. Since we can guarantee that Social Security will not cause harm, we should not watch at the same time, the simplistic assertion that this is an offense. But should urge the relevant laws and regulations of the country with the progress of the times improved, more calmly deal with similar events.